Ok, lemme commit the config fix.

Thanks for persisting with this!


-a


On 8 May 2014 20:48, Kaho Toshikazu <k...@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote:
>   Hello,
>
> Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> So what's the value of txchainmask and rxchainmask from the EEPROM?
>> before things get overridden?
>>
>> I'd like to figure out what that changed.
>
> In both before and after applying the patch, sc->txchainmask=1,
> sc->rxchainmask=3, ntxsteams=1. I think that 1st breakage
> introduced by r258030 in the function iwn_set_link_quality()
> was already fixed by r258085.
>
> 2nd breakage introduced by r258035 seems to be fixed by the patch.
> Because 2nd breakage was introduced before 1st breakage was fixed,
> we faced to a difficulty tracking down the problem.
> I don't know a meaning of a parameter .calib_need,
> but it is something wrong and it is corrected by the patch.
>
> --
> Kaho Toshikazu
>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to