On 8 May 2014 21:09, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Ok, lemme commit the config fix.
> Thanks for persisting with this!
> On 8 May 2014 20:48, Kaho Toshikazu <k...@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote:
>> Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> So what's the value of txchainmask and rxchainmask from the EEPROM?
>>> before things get overridden?
>>> I'd like to figure out what that changed.
>> In both before and after applying the patch, sc->txchainmask=1,
>> sc->rxchainmask=3, ntxsteams=1. I think that 1st breakage
>> introduced by r258030 in the function iwn_set_link_quality()
>> was already fixed by r258085.
>> 2nd breakage introduced by r258035 seems to be fixed by the patch.
>> Because 2nd breakage was introduced before 1st breakage was fixed,
>> we faced to a difficulty tracking down the problem.
>> I don't know a meaning of a parameter .calib_need,
>> but it is something wrong and it is corrected by the patch.
>> Kaho Toshikazu
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"