Hello, thank you for your reply. > Would you mind clarifying what you wrote a little more? > What I'm reading this as: > > * If I grab an r258030 tree, it's broken on your NIC > * If I then do what, apply r258034, it works? > * If I apply 258035 -> 258085, it also works? > > I really would appreciate it if you would re-state what you've written > so I/we can better understand :-) > > Something like: > > * Revision X, doesn't work > * Revision X with revisions A, B and then C applied, does work > * Revision X with A, B and C applied, and a modified revision D > applied, does work (and attach the modified revision D) > > That way I/we can clearly reproduce what you've done. :-) > > Thanks!
I'm sorry for my ambiguous representation. Until Revision 257951, work. >From r258030 to r258034, doesn't work. If antmask_2stream set to be IWN_ANT_AB, work. After r258035, doesn't work. antmask_2stream = IWN_ANT_AB doesn't help. > Ok. So r258030 changed the antenna configuration for transmitting to > use the tx chainmask from the EEPROM settings,r ather than hard-coding > it to IWN_ANT_AB. This is needed because a bunch of NICs actually > don't have two antennas and if you feed it IWN_ANT_AB it just plainly > doesn't work. > > So, if you try -HEAD, but you set antmask_2stream to be IWN_ANT_AB, > does it fix the problem? > > Ie, add this line > > linkq.antmsk_2stream = IWN_ANT_AB; > > .. just after this line: > > linkq.ampdu_limit = htole16(4000); Yes, it fix the problem until r258034, but doesn't fix after r258035. Rivision 258035 changed many lines and if_iwn_chip_cfg.h was created. I faced a trouble about where should I try to change. -- Kaho Toshikazu _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
