I have tried out the editor in the development branch before. What it
does, it does well, but a lot of functionality hasn't been implemented
But that's beside the point. Freeciv 2.2 won't be out for years.
Should 2.1 users be left without a map editor? It will certainly be
the bane for Freeciv 2.1 as a platform for scenario creation.
Can the editor code be easily backported to S2_1?
On 2/5/07, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IIRC there were some port attempts, but there were too many changes to
It was eventually decided that we should try to incorporate the
into the regular civclient, via an edit mode, changing it to enable
remote map editing.
I believe some of these features are in CVS right now, but support is
and poorly tested.
On 2/5/07, Daniel Markstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried the old unofficial win32 build of Civworld from late 2004
> ), and it seems to be working fine with 2.0.8. The instructions were
> outdated though and potentially confusing, so I modified the package
> slightly and uploaded to our ftp.
> How much would the Civworld code for 2.0 have to be modified to work
> with 2.1? Even though a build-in editor is in the works for 2.2, we
> should still IMO have a Civworld 2.1.
> Freeciv-dev mailing list
Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa
Freeciv-dev mailing list