Follow-up Comment #6, patch #4400 (project freeciv): VUT_IMPROVEMENT/REQ_RANGE_CONTINENT: Indeed, this just adds a yak.
Articles: this is probably an artefact of having dealt with i18n too much, but yes, there is no good solution without ruleset integration (another yak). PL_(): Thanks for the pointer: I retract my criticism entirely :) VUT_TERRAINALTER: The current code is very prone to false positives, but upon further investigation, the gen_extras stuff hasn't made it completely obsolete yet, so probably another yak (perhaps to be handled as part of thought around patch #3756). Version 4 of the trunk patch looks good to me now. I'm not confident in my ability to carefully review the S2_5 one after looking at the trunk one, but it at least passes cursory examination. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://gna.org/patch/?4400> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freecivfirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev