Follow-up Comment #6, patch #4400 (project freeciv):
VUT_IMPROVEMENT/REQ_RANGE_CONTINENT: Indeed, this just adds a yak.
Articles: this is probably an artefact of having dealt with i18n too much, but
yes, there is no good solution without ruleset integration (another yak).
PL_(): Thanks for the pointer: I retract my criticism entirely :)
VUT_TERRAINALTER: The current code is very prone to false positives, but upon
further investigation, the gen_extras stuff hasn't made it completely obsolete
yet, so probably another yak (perhaps to be handled as part of thought around
patch #3756).
Version 4 of the trunk patch looks good to me now. I'm not confident in
my ability to carefully review the S2_5 one after looking at the trunk one,
but it at least passes cursory examination.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/patch/?4400>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
