On 10/3/14, Marko Lindqvist <cazf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20 August 2014 15:28, Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> <sveinun...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> Generalized action enablers
>> Current status: All spy actions are controlled by generalized action
>> enablers. Most requirements to enable the spy actions live in the
>> ruleset. Some rough edges remain.
>  The question I have about action enablers is that should we limit
> their scope in 2.6 to "diplomat & caravan actions", or are we going to
> throw in other kind of actions too? Diplomat+Caravan would at least be
> clear cutting point so we don't end to adding "just one more action
> type" when S2_6 should be stabilizing.

Good question. Another alternative is to limit 2.6 to unit vs city
(not cities) and unit vs unit (not units).

> The question arises as I have
> some action enablers in my TODO (to either do myself, or to at least
> raise a ticket) and I'm not sure if I should postpone to after S2_6
> branching.

I'm glad to hear this.

>> Generalized actions
>> Not started. Will probably wait until after 2.6. May in stead add some
>> new hard coded actions that ruleset authors can play with.
>  This is not an dependency (even soft one) for any other features
> going to 2.6?

Correct. If an action needs configuration it can be done as regular options.

> This sounds like something that takes us forever to get
> AI to handle -> better to leave to beginning of 3.0 cycle than to make
> 2.6 wait it to get ready and stable.



Freeciv-dev mailing list

Reply via email to