On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 10:01:59 AM Michael Vehrs wrote: > On 03.09.2012 05:14, Michael T. Pope wrote: > > [Colony is a GoodsLocation, and therefore a UnitLocation, but it does > > *not* use the units list inside UnitLocation]
> Yes, we should make certain of that. But how? Will tests be sufficient? > Do we need an AbstractUnitLocation, so that classes that do not use the > standard unit list can inherit from that? I suspect the latter would be > the approach approved by the OO methodologists. I expect you are right about OO methodology. However it seems a little premature to introduce a new abstraction to cover only one exception from a norm. My work-avoidance rule of thumb is to wait until there are at least three distinct cases:-), so I was thinking of just a few more emphatic warning comments for now. Your call here. Cheers, Mike Pope
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
