On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:42:54 PM Michael Vehrs wrote: > Sounds sensible. I hope I have not introduced any new serialization > bugs. At any rate, I added a new type of test to check for serialization > problems.
My overnight test failed for unrelated (AI) reasons so I am unable to comment yet on the robustness. I will kick off another one before leaving for work. The serialization test though is a clear win. I predict that will catch many future mistakes. > I could start work on eliminating the GoodsContainer, if you > think it worthwhile. If not, I think I'll have a look at the map editor, > which seems to have bitrotted. Both are useful. Any chance of looking at the starvation bug? That one is verging on a release blocker IMHO. Speaking of which, the reworking of TransportMission is at the point that it runs (usually:-), and performs worse than the existing code in terms of delivering cargoes to destinations. It does however deliver the REF. I have had too many busy weekends lately, but hope to turn its performance around this week. Cheers, Mike Pope
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
