On 17.09.2012 00:31, Michael T. Pope wrote: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:42:54 PM Michael Vehrs wrote: > >> Sounds sensible. I hope I have not introduced any new serialization >> bugs. At any rate, I added a new type of test to check for serialization >> problems. >> > My overnight test failed for unrelated (AI) reasons so I am unable to comment > yet on the robustness. I will kick off another one before leaving for work. > > The serialization test though is a clear win. I predict that will catch many > future mistakes. >
I hope so, too. > >> I could start work on eliminating the GoodsContainer, if you >> think it worthwhile. If not, I think I'll have a look at the map editor, >> which seems to have bitrotted. >> > Both are useful. Any chance of looking at the starvation bug? That one is > verging on a release blocker IMHO. > I could, but aren't there some guys who wanted to sort out food production? I wouldn't want to interfere with their work. If horses do eat fish after all, we can basically throw away the ProductionTree code. > Speaking of which, the reworking of TransportMission is at the point that it > runs (usually:-), and performs worse than the existing code in terms of > delivering cargoes to destinations. It does however deliver the REF. I have > had too many busy weekends lately, but hope to turn its performance around > this week. > > Cheers, > Mike Pope > Regards Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
