Well hopefully the multi-cores are true multi-taskers and you're getting the time savings you thing you are. You are definitely wasting time with the swapping function on single core CPUs. Its faster in single cores to just complete one task at a time, let a routines finish before starting another one.
Some of you seem inexperienced at the early attempts to multi-task on Intel chips. Nothing but fun in that era! An old rule of thumb, run DOS apps under DOS, run Windows apps under Windows OS, OS/2 apps under OS/2 and so on. Emulators, shells or cross platform support is just looking for bugs! I had hoped the next generation of IT workers had learned more skepticism and cynicism when it came to claims by various manufactures and OS developers. And I had also hoped they were little leery of the current fads, trends, etc.. in IT. I want to make a point here. The people who have the power to and do make industry direction setting decisions aren't necessarily making the right decisions. I roll out some turkeys that got a lot of press and attention back in the day but ultimately failed. PUSH tech, the ACE initiative, EISIE bus, Windows Vista and so on. Rule of thumb, if it has a cool sounding acronym it came from little boys who don't have a professional focus on the work. And hell yeah! If you learned to write in any computer language this automatically qualifies you as genius! NOT! Learning to write code is easy. Writing "good" code is what separates the little boys from geniuses. Its not as easy as you everyone has themselves convinced it is. Anyone who thinks they're a "Para dig em" shifting code busting genius who's gonna change the world is almost certainly a wanker destined for lifetime of producing bad code and bad ideas if they don't end up washing dishing for a living! The stuff that does have big impacts is often discovered accidentally and not really what the code buster was aiming for or expecting. Those who think they're genius code is going to make them and their investors rich are almost certainly destined for a dishwashing career! CB On 4/23/14, Charles Belhumeur <chbelhumeur2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Experience has given me a preference for low-level machine compilable > languages Assembler and like the various flavors of C. I don't like > languages like JAVA that ride a non-machine specific protocol and ride > atop emulators or interpreters on top a browser on top an OS on top > sophisticated hardware. They tend to be problematic, flaky, because > you don't know what all the routines you ride are doing or if they're > reliable across all implementations. > > And the hit in performance you take riding on top all those routines > written by wankers really sucks compared to what you get from machine > specific compiled code. I spend enough time looking the hourglass > waiting for JAVA scripts to run as it is. I don't want to add to this > wank'in time wasting practice. > > CB > > On 4/23/14, Chris Evans <aaxiomfin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Its the startup bios that supports boot mode. once they move from legacy >> to >> UEFI your older mbr drives will not boot. >> >> >> --- >> I'd guess that, even with UEFI replacing legacy BIOS, bootable USB sticks >> with MBR partitioning will still be bootable, subject to the underlyimg >> OS >> being otherwise compatible with the hardware. >> >> -- >> -chris >> Computer Consultant & Repair Tech >> Digitalatoll Solutions Group >> Tawhaki Software >> http://digitalatoll.com/ >> http://tawakisoft.com/ >> Cell: 916-612-6904 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Thomas Mueller <mueller6...@twc.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Excerpt from Rugxulo: >>> >>> > DOS on modern IBM PC clones have too many hardware compatibility >>> > issues: power management, lack of networking (almost no packet >>> > drivers), no soundcard drivers (or even static libs), almost no USB >>> > support. It doesn't look like most hardware companies care enough to >>> > waste time on it. Heck, half the time they don't seem to even properly >>> > support Linux. And DJGPP isn't exactly brimming with enthusiastic new >>> > users or tons of ports from Linux maintainers either. >>> >>> > So expecting anything beyond what we've already got is probably naive >>> > (sadly). They probably (rightly? hope not!) think that DOS will really >>> > disappear once the BIOS is totally replaced by UEFI in all new OEM >>> > shipments. I know some people think some partial BIOS compatibility >>> > will be available, but I'm very skeptical. >>> >>> > In other words, it's complicated! >>> >>> Now I have modern computer hardware, and can't even successfully install >>> FreeDOS. >>> >>> I once succeeded on a 4 GB USB stick, Ativa, twist-turn style, but that >>> went bad, actually came apart physically. >>> >>> This installation could read the header/title of a CD but no more in a >>> SATA DVD-RW drive. >>> >>> I also had a FreeDOS installation on a 341 MB IDE hard drive but can no >>> longer read that hard drive, now using Sabrent USB 2.0 enclosure. >>> >>> I am able to read two other old IDE hard drives in that enclosure. >>> >>> But there is hope, considering that the FreeDOS image on System Rescue >>> CD >>> boots and runs, at least if I use no memory manager. >>> >>> FreeDOS can read and write to USB drive with FAT16 or FAT32 file system >>> thanks to BIOS/UEFI support, but only as a fixed disk: only when in port >>> at >>> boot time, and no good when changing USB sticks. >>> >>> FreeDOS can't read my hard drive because of lack of support for GPT. >>> >>> I can't access Ethernet or wi-fi through FreeDOS at all, at least not >>> yet. >>> I haven't downloaded Glenn McCorkle's March 2013 update of Arachne for >>> DOS. Even if I could make the network work in FreeDOS, lack of support >>> for >>> Javascript or HTTPS makes Arachne useful just as a curiosity; so many >>> more >>> functional browsers available for Linux and BSD. >>> >>> I wonder about the possibility of making hardware work in FreeDOS >>> through >>> UEFI initializing the devices, or Ethernet through PXE boot. >>> >>> I believe DJGPP is pretty much lame-duck now. >>> >>> I'd guess that, even with UEFI replacing legacy BIOS, bootable USB >>> sticks >>> with MBR partitioning will still be bootable, subject to the underlyimg >>> OS >>> being otherwise compatible with the hardware. >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform >>> Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software >>> Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready >>> Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Freedos-devel mailing list >>> Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
