@Eric Auer <e.a...@jpberlin.de> Basically he was pretty sure that it would simply be too much work. See the discussion in this other GitHub thread: https://github.com/volkertb/temu-vsb/issues/4#issuecomment-703362672
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:36 AM Volkert <volke...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:26 AM Volkert <volke...@users.sourceforge.net> > wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:36 AM Eric Auer <e.a...@jpberlin.de> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Volkert, >>> >>> which worries does Japheth have regarding accepting I/O trap patches? >>> >> >> He wrote: *"My experiences - so far - with patches from unknown people >> are "mixed". So I'm rather sceptical."* >> Source: >> https://github.com/Baron-von-Riedesel/Jemm/issues/5#issuecomment-770343181 >> >> As for my suggestion to implement this in the form of a JLM (and the >> question whether that would even be >> possible), he hasn't replied to that yet. >> > > @Eric Auer <e.a...@jpberlin.de> Sorry, I confused two things in my answer > above: this was in response to my request > for GEMMIS support, not for implementing the EMM386 I/O port trapping API. > I never created a GitHub issue > for that. (I did open a separate feature request for QPI support, namely > the I/O port trapping API of QEMM, but > I closed that issue when it became clear that this would not be > implemented.) > > But apparently Japeth's is skeptical of third party patches from unknown > people in general. I guess it would > help if someone who he knows well and trusts would be willing to step up > to the plate here. > >
_______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
