Hi, On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Ralf Quint <freedos...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/23/2015 7:02 PM, Rugxulo wrote: >> >> But what's the problem? It's not like 1.9 disappeared. It's still >> mirrored in various places (not to mention iBiblio): > > Well, the source repository, with the latest daily/weekly builds is not > accessible, mind you that the 1.9 version is now a few years old...
Who owns it? Necasek? Isn't he active on his OS/2 Museum site? He shouldn't be too impossibly hard to get ahold of. >> No idea what you're referring to. I haven't kept up literally at all. >> I'm not subscribed to the newsgroups. > > Well, too bad, after all, you all are always referring to OW as the "go > to" compiler for FreeDOS... OW is a great compiler, but I just can't follow every piece of software. >> Like Dennis said, there's an OW fork available on SourceForge, which >> does have 2.0-pre binaries (even for DOS), that was updated last >> month. >> > That's the problem, going by all the discussions that have been going > on, it is not clear/certain that Jiri's fork is a proper working > version, at least as far as (Free)DOS as a target is concerned... I'd be surprised if FreeDOS got any love. I just assumed everyone was more interested in boring things like Win64. :-P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user