On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:01:56 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 12/18/2014 02:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:56:47 +0100 > > thierry bordaz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 12/16/2014 05:44 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > >>> On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:40:20 -0500 > >>> Simo Sorce <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:57:34 +0100 > >>>> Ludwig Krispenz <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 12/16/2014 03:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:33:41 +0100 > >>>>>> Ludwig Krispenz <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Simo, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> one thing is not quite clear to me: do you want a domain level > >>>>>>> per feature or a global domain level or both ? > >>>>>> The Domain Level is global. > >>>>>> I described a "Feature Version" that is published by feature. > >>>>>> The Feature Versions just state what is available they do not > >>>>>> determine what is the current overall Domain Level. > >>>>> Ok, just to confirm my understanding. > >>>>> > >>>>> - we have one domain level. > >>>> Yes. > >> Hello, > >> > >> Domain level can only be increased. Can it interfere with the > >> ability of the admin to downgrade a software version ? > > Yes it will interfere, but the domain level will never be > > automatically raised, so the admin has time to do tests for normal > > functionality, and can wait to raise the domain level if there are > > reports of issues with newer functionality. > there is one more scenario I would like to clarify. If a new replica > is installed or a client promoted to a replica, this means th enew > installation of a DS instance, which for some time is not connected > to the rest of the topology until its shared date are initialized > from an existing server in the topology. After the total init is > complete, it can check the set domain level and act accordingly. > But how should it act before, assuming domain level 0, or should > admin/scripts set a temporary domain level in the neew server, even > if it will be overwritten later by replica initialization ? I would assume 0 until told otherwise for now. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
