On 15.7.2015 17:39, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 15/07/15 17:38, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 15.7.2015 17:33, Martin Basti wrote:
>>> On 15/07/15 16:03, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>> On 15/07/15 15:39, Petr Vobornik wrote:
>>>>> On 07/15/2015 02:42 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>>>> Patch attached.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4934
>>>>>>       https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5055
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you adding RP, APL, IPSEC, DHCID, HIP, SPF records? Is there a 
>>>>> plan
>>>>> to use them? Can't we just not use unsupported records in LDAPSearch'?
>>>>> (which would fix #5055)
>>>> I had discussion with Petr2, and we decided to do it this way, because 
>>>> these
>>>> records are valid.
>>>>
>>>> Removing unsupported records from search changes the behavior of the DNS
>>>> commands. Now IPA shows even unsupported records which cannot be modified 
>>>> by
>>>> API. AFAIK we want to keep this behavior.
>>>>
>>> Updated patch attached.
>>>
>>> I forgot to remove DNSKEY from object class definition.
>> Are you 100 % sure that it will not break on upgrade? Please double-check 
>> that
>> with Thierry.
>>
> IT was my change before we decided that DNSKEY should not be there, it is not
> in git repo.

I see, okay.

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to