On 15.7.2015 17:39, Martin Basti wrote: > On 15/07/15 17:38, Petr Spacek wrote: >> On 15.7.2015 17:33, Martin Basti wrote: >>> On 15/07/15 16:03, Martin Basti wrote: >>>> On 15/07/15 15:39, Petr Vobornik wrote: >>>>> On 07/15/2015 02:42 PM, Martin Basti wrote: >>>>>> Patch attached. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4934 >>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5055 >>>>>> >>>>> Why are you adding RP, APL, IPSEC, DHCID, HIP, SPF records? Is there a >>>>> plan >>>>> to use them? Can't we just not use unsupported records in LDAPSearch'? >>>>> (which would fix #5055) >>>> I had discussion with Petr2, and we decided to do it this way, because >>>> these >>>> records are valid. >>>> >>>> Removing unsupported records from search changes the behavior of the DNS >>>> commands. Now IPA shows even unsupported records which cannot be modified >>>> by >>>> API. AFAIK we want to keep this behavior. >>>> >>> Updated patch attached. >>> >>> I forgot to remove DNSKEY from object class definition. >> Are you 100 % sure that it will not break on upgrade? Please double-check >> that >> with Thierry. >> > IT was my change before we decided that DNSKEY should not be there, it is not > in git repo.
I see, okay. -- Petr^2 Spacek -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code
