On (24/06/16 17:53), Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
>On 24.06.2016 15:09, Martin Basti wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 24.06.2016 14:59, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:00:24PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
>> > > 
>> > > On 22.06.2016 23:20, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > > > On (22/06/16 11:57), Martin Basti wrote:
>> > > > > On 09.06.2016 21:02, Martin Basti wrote:
>> > > > > > On 09.06.2016 14:45, Martin Basti wrote:
>> > > > > > > On 09.06.2016 14:42, Martin Basti wrote:
>> > > > > > > > On 09.06.2016 14:38, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > On (09/06/16 14:29), Martin Basti wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > On 09.06.2016 14:22, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 09 Jun 2016, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:23:46PM +0200, Sumit Bose 
>> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > this patch allows the extom plugin to lookup
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > users by certificate which
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > is needed in the case where a IPA client
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > wants to lookup an AD user who
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > has the certificate stored in AD. To make
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > this work the related patches
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > I just send to sssd-devel are needed as well.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently the patches miss the change in the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > required version of SSSD.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > since the SSSD patches are not committed. But
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > the patches are needed to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > fully test the SSSD patches. I will send a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > new version with the needed
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > changes to the minimal SSSD version when the SSSD 
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > patches are
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > committed.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > bye,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sumit
>> > > > > > > > > > > > The patch works fine (tested
>> > > > > > > > > > > > together with the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > corresponding SSSD
>> > > > > > > > > > > > patches), so ACK from me. The code also looks
>> > > > > > > > > > > > good to me, but I'm not
>> > > > > > > > > > > > sure if reviewing an IPA patch requires something
>> > > > > > > > > > > > more (CI? Coverity?)
>> > > > > > > > > > > ACK from me as well, I forgot to send email about it,
>> > > > > > > > > > > though I reviewed
>> > > > > > > > > > > this patch a week ago.
>> > > > > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > > > Pushed to master: aa734da49440c5d12c0f8d4566505adaeef254e8
>> > > > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > > It's very likey that this commit will break build of
>> > > > > > > > > freeipa-master. I didn't try.
>> > > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > > Because it uses new function sss_nss_getnamebycert
>> > > > > > > > > from the library libsss_nss_idmap which is not in fedora.
>> > > > > > > > > It was pushed to sssd master just today.
>> > > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > > LS
>> > > > > > > > If this is true, can you/somebody provide the SRPM of SSSD with
>> > > > > > > > the required functionality please? We may need to add it to
>> > > > > > > > @freeipa/freeipa-master copr and bump required version of SSSD.
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > Martin^2
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > Yes, you were right, master build is broken.
>> > > > > > > Martin^2
>> > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > SSSD master build has been added to
>> > > > > > @freeipa/freeipa-master copr as a
>> > > > > > workaround (to unblock automatic testing an developers)
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Please bump version in specfile accordingly (I don't know in which
>> > > > > > version of SSSD will be required function)
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Martin^2
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > Bumping SSSD version in requires and buildrequires
>> > > > > Patch attached
>> > > > >From f2b394085157954768bc93a73b854778c65bfdcd Mon Sep 17
>> > > > 00:00:00 2001
>> > > > > From: Martin Basti <mba...@redhat.com>
>> > > > > Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:49:39 +0200
>> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] Bump SSSD requires
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4955
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > > freeipa.spec.in | 4 ++--
>> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > diff --git a/freeipa.spec.in b/freeipa.spec.in
>> > > > > index 
>> > > > > 0d5c745d5306cd7141c573454bd1c1e6a78c7e7f..befc7af9ee2ceefa41b1b999df4bdb1c6607bea8
>> > > > > 100644
>> > > > > --- a/freeipa.spec.in
>> > > > > +++ b/freeipa.spec.in
>> > > > > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ BuildRequires:  python-pyasn1 >= 0.0.9a
>> > > > > BuildRequires:  python-qrcode-core >= 5.0.0
>> > > > > BuildRequires:  python-dns >= 1.11.1
>> > > > > BuildRequires:  libsss_idmap-devel
>> > > > > -BuildRequires:  libsss_nss_idmap-devel >= 1.12.2
>> > > > > +BuildRequires:  libsss_nss_idmap-devel >= 1.14.0
>> > > > > BuildRequires:  java-headless
>> > > > > BuildRequires:  rhino
>> > > > > BuildRequires:  libverto-devel
>> > > > > @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ Requires: pam_krb5
>> > > > > Requires: curl
>> > > > > Requires: libcurl >= 7.21.7-2
>> > > > > Requires: xmlrpc-c >= 1.27.4
>> > > > > -Requires: sssd >= 1.13.3-5
>> > > > > +Requires: sssd >= 1.14.0
>> > > > NACK
>> > > Thank you.
>> > > > A) It's not explained in commit message why you need to bump
>> > > > Requires for sssd.
>> > > >      IIRC, you need just new libsss_nss_idmap-devel.
>> > > I don't know actually, would be nice if author of the original
>> > > patch can
>> > > confirm if newer SSSD is required or not
>> > Currently both are required. 'BuildRequires: libsss_nss_idmap-devel >=
>> > 1.14.0' is needed for the build because the new call
>> > sss_nss_getnamebycert() is needed to look up trusted users by
>> > certificate.
>> > 
>> > At runtime 'Requires: sssd >= 1.14.0' is needed because currently
>> > libsss_nss_idmap does not have a dependency to sssd. If only the
>> > libsss_nss_idmap would be updated and not SSSD the
>> > sss_nss_getnamebycert() would just return a not implemented error code
>> > because the older versions of SSSD cannot handle the request.
>> > 
>> > HTH
>> > 
>> > bye,
>> > Sumit
>> Thank you for explanation, updated patch attached.
>> 
>> Martin^2
>
>Requested 'sss_nss_idmap >= 1.14.0' but version of sss_nss_idmap is 1.13.90
>You may find new versions of sss_nss_idmap at http://fedorahosted.org/sssd/
>
>libsss_nss_idmap-devel-1.14.0-1.fc24.alpha.x86_64
>
>Is it possible that you forgot to increment this version on SSSD side, or it
>is my failure?
>
No, it is how we release alpha version.
beta will be 1.13.91

libsss_nss_idmap-devel-1.14.0 is just fake version changed in spec file.

You might still want to wait for 1.14.0 for this patch.

LS

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to