On 09/23/2016 02:09 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 23.09.2016 09:54, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 06:09:43PM +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> As you know, FedoraHosted.org will be decommissioned.
>>> https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedorahosted-sunset-2017-02-28/
>>> We use Trac instance there. Let's discuss where we should migrate and
>>> what are our requirements. Then put results on one place. For that I've
>>> created:
>>>    http://www.freeipa.org/page/FedoraHosted_Migration
>> That you for writing this up, there are some good points I didn't think
>> about, like migrating the ticket numbers. Did you already file an issue
>> that tracks this in Pagure (or asked if this is already possible)?
> Do we need review by field? It is recorded in commit and for ongoing
> reviews we are assigning ourselves to pull requests, so everybody knows
> if somebody is reviewing a PR.
> Martin^2

Assigning to PR solves the issue for which "review by" was meant. So we
may eventually drop it. Ideally when patch backlog on devel list is

In general, I'd not say that each individual field is a requirement,
e.g. I can imagine that: keywords, source, component, maybe even a
milestone and a priority can be tags/labels

What would be nice is some reporting/filtering capability so that I
don't have to script each view separately.
Petr Vobornik

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to