On 15/03/16 13:42, Rob Crittenden wrote:
last - this must most FAQ people wonder - can IPA's 389
backend be used in the same/similar fashion samba uses ldap?
skipping all the kerberos bits? (samba & IPA on the same one
this might be more 389-ds related - in old days I remember
DS had mozldap dedicated toolset, how is it these days? How
do users deal with 389-ds IPA-related bits?
On 14/03/16 17:06, Rob Crittenden wrote:
ipa: ERROR: group LDAP search did not return any result (search base:
ou=groups,dc=ccnr,dc=biotechnology, objectclass: groupofuniquenames,
I see users went in but later I realized that current samba's ou was
"group" not groups.
Can I just re-run migrations?
Yes. It will skip over anything that already exists in IPA.
thanks Rob, may I ask why process by defaults looks up only objectclass:
It is conservative but this is why it can be overridden.
Is there a reason it skips ldap+samba typical posixGroup &
We haven't had many (any?) reports of migrating from ldap+samba.
Lastly, is there a way to preserve account locked/disabled status for
I don't know how it is stored but as long as the schema is available in
IPA then the values should be preserved on migration unless the
attributes are associated with a blacklisted objectclass.
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project