Al Chu <[email protected]> writes: > Hey Dave, > >> Ah. solpayloadsize,sun20 did establish a connexion, but I think the >> speed may be wrong as it appears dead once connected. On the other >> hand, after disconnecting, that seems to have taken the ILOM off the >> air... That is with the earliest ILOM, anyway, though it's annoying it >> looks more broken in the latest. > > Well, glad it got further. What motherboard is this? I can add it to > the list of workarounds.
solpayloadsize,sun20 got a connexion on x4100 with ILOM 1.0. I can't see a way to make ILOM 2.0.2.5 on x4100 work. I think it's only the ILOM version which is relevant, though. ILOM 2.0.<whatever> behaves essentially the same on the x4200, x4200m2, and x4500 systems I have; the MBs are certainly different physically, between them, but I don't know what differences might be relevant. [You can poke about on it under busybox, but I've never tried to check exactly what's there on the different installations.] _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
