Hey Dave, Great, I'll add that into the docs.
Al On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:32 +0100, Dave Love wrote: > Al Chu <[email protected]> writes: > > > Hey Dave, > > > >> Ah. solpayloadsize,sun20 did establish a connexion, but I think the > >> speed may be wrong as it appears dead once connected. On the other > >> hand, after disconnecting, that seems to have taken the ILOM off the > >> air... That is with the earliest ILOM, anyway, though it's annoying it > >> looks more broken in the latest. > > > > Well, glad it got further. What motherboard is this? I can add it to > > the list of workarounds. > > solpayloadsize,sun20 got a connexion on x4100 with ILOM 1.0. I can't > see a way to make ILOM 2.0.2.5 on x4100 work. > > I think it's only the ILOM version which is relevant, though. ILOM > 2.0.<whatever> behaves essentially the same on the x4200, x4200m2, and > x4500 systems I have; the MBs are certainly different physically, > between them, but I don't know what differences might be relevant. [You > can poke about on it under busybox, but I've never tried to check > exactly what's there on the different installations.] -- Albert Chu [email protected] Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
