Dear Eric, the problem with xsd2jibx is solved as I have written my own conversion library compileXsd which is under GPLv2+ as FreeMind itself.
HTH, Chris Eric Lavarde - FreeMind schrieb: > Hi, > > Christian Foltin (GMX) said: > >> Hi Eric, >> >> using jibx1.2 is difficult. I tried with emphasis, but the complete >> generation is different. It uses Integer vs. int all the time, >> and the array name conventions are totally different. This means a lot >> of code change, which is not what I want at this time. >> > I very much understand and support this position. > > >> But do you even need xsd2jibx at package build time? Can't we take the >> output of xsd2jibx (ie java classes and binding.xml) and >> omit xsd2jibx completely? >> > You mean, declare those java classes and binding as sources and upload > them to CVS respectively pack them in the released sources? I think this > would be acceptable, a bit borderline in regard to the definition of > "source", but it would solve my issue and allow me to bring FreeMind into > Debian. > > So, yes, I would appreciate if you could do this, (let me know if *I* can > do something to support you), > Eric > > >> HTH, Chris >> >> Eric Lavarde - FreeMind schrieb: >> >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understood your question. >>> >>> If the question is whether xsd2jibx is only needed at package build time >>> and NOT at run time, the answer is YES. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> Christian Foltin (GMX) said: >>> >>> >>>> Hi Eric, >>>> >>>> that's only for the src package, right? >>>> >>>> Regards, Chris >>>> >>>> Eric Lavarde schrieb: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hello Chris, >>>>> >>>>> while still trying to package FreeMind 0.9.0 for Debian, and hence >>>>> needed xsd2jibx packages, I got the attached refusal. I already >>>>> contacted the upstream author for JiBX but didn't get so far any >>>>> answer (2nd attached message). >>>>> >>>>> Would it be an alternative for you to move from JiBx 1.0 to JiBX 1.2? >>>>> I understand that JiBX 1.2 doesn't require xsd2jibx anymore (well, it >>>>> doesn't deliver it for sure). >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, Eric >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Betreff: >>>>> libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED >>>>> Von: >>>>> Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]> >>>>> Datum: >>>>> Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:25:07 +0000 >>>>> An: >>>>> Eric Lavarde <[email protected]>, Debian Java Maintainers >>>>> <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> An: >>>>> Eric Lavarde <[email protected]>, Debian Java Maintainers >>>>> <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>> CC: >>>>> Debian Installer <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Maintainer, >>>>> >>>>> rejected, i dont believe your debian/copyright file statement about >>>>> the >>>>> license. Only one file in the tarball has a header stating the same, >>>>> the >>>>> others dont have any. There is no extra file describing the license. >>>>> AND >>>>> docs/index.html contains "Licensed to the JiBX Project for free >>>>> distribution and use." which makes it non-distributable for everyone >>>>> else. With this unresolved it can't even go into non-free. >>>>> >>>>> Please have upstream fix his tarball if you want it in Debian, thanks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Betreff: >>>>> [Fwd: libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED] >>>>> Von: >>>>> "Eric Lavarde - Debian" <[email protected]> >>>>> Datum: >>>>> Fri, 8 May 2009 12:56:24 +0200 (CEST) >>>>> An: >>>>> "Dennis Sosnoski" <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> An: >>>>> "Dennis Sosnoski" <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hello Dennis, >>>>> >>>>> I had contacted you like 3 years ago because I planned (and did) >>>>> package >>>>> xsd2jibx for Debian. Now (after many delays due to a very long >>>>> FreeMind >>>>> release cycle) has come the time to get the package officially into >>>>> Debian, but I'm facing a quite hefty rejection from the Debian FTP >>>>> masters >>>>> (see below). >>>>> >>>>> Further informations: >>>>> >>>>> - I have already packaged Jibx 1.0.2 [1], as it's the version needed >>>>> by >>>>> FreeMind [2] and 1.1.x is not completely backward compatible (I didn't >>>>> even look at 1.2), and I am not sure I could fix properly issues >>>>> arising >>>>> through these incompatibilities, as I'm not a full blown Java >>>>> programmer. >>>>> >>>>> - My next step would have been to check Xsd2Jibx version 0.0.0beta2b >>>>> and >>>>> see if it solves the below copyright/license issue. >>>>> >>>>> - but, with version 1.2, you've removed xsd2jibx from the download >>>>> section. >>>>> >>>>> So, now, I'm a bit stuck, and I would appreciate your help and >>>>> support: >>>>> >>>>> 1. could you make xsd2jibx downloadable again? >>>>> >>>>> 2. would the latest version solve my below licensing issues? If not, >>>>> would >>>>> a new release be a possibility? (I would offer to prepare it with >>>>> doing >>>>> the necessary licensing changes, for you to just validate and >>>>> release). >>>>> >>>>> 3. or perhaps you have another suggestion? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot, Eric >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=jibx >>>>> [2] htttp://freemind.sf.net/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------- Original Message >>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>> Subject: libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED >>>>> From: "Joerg Jaspert" <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Sat, April 25, 2009 18:25 >>>>> To: "Eric Lavarde" <[email protected]> >>>>> "Debian Java Maintainers" >>>>> <[email protected]> [email protected] >>>>> Cc: "Debian Installer" <[email protected]> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Hi Maintainer, >>>>> >>>>> rejected, i dont believe your debian/copyright file statement about >>>>> the >>>>> license. Only one file in the tarball has a header stating the same, >>>>> the >>>>> others dont have any. There is no extra file describing the license. >>>>> AND >>>>> docs/index.html contains "Licensed to the JiBX Project for free >>>>> distribution and use." which makes it non-distributable for everyone >>>>> else. >>>>> With this unresolved it can't even go into non-free. >>>>> >>>>> Please have upstream fix his tarball if you want it in Debian, thanks. >>>>> >>>>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT > is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & > iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com > _______________________________________________ > Freemind-developer mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
