ROTFL :-)

Seriously: where I can get the jar file/the sources? Then I would start
packaging those.

Thanks, Eric

Christian Foltin (GMX) said:
> Dear Eric,
>
> I forgot that the sources are included in the jar and that I dedicate
> this development to a big german flight company whose 6:45 flight at the
> morning was cancelled...
>
> Chris
>
> Christian Foltin (GMX) schrieb:
>> Dear Eric,
>>
>> the problem with xsd2jibx is solved as I have written my own
>> conversion library compileXsd which is under GPLv2+ as FreeMind itself.
>>
>> HTH, Chris
>>
>> Eric Lavarde - FreeMind schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Christian Foltin (GMX) said:
>>>
>>>> Hi Eric,
>>>>
>>>> using jibx1.2 is difficult. I tried with emphasis, but the complete
>>>> generation is different. It uses Integer vs. int all the time,
>>>> and the array name conventions are totally different. This means a lot
>>>> of code change, which is not what I want at this time.
>>>>
>>> I very much understand and support this position.
>>>
>>>
>>>> But do you even need xsd2jibx at package build time? Can't we take the
>>>> output of xsd2jibx (ie java classes and binding.xml) and
>>>> omit xsd2jibx completely?
>>>>
>>> You mean, declare those java classes and binding as sources and upload
>>> them to CVS respectively pack them in the released sources? I think
>>> this
>>> would be acceptable, a bit borderline in regard to the definition of
>>> "source", but it would solve my issue and allow me to bring FreeMind
>>> into
>>> Debian.
>>>
>>> So, yes, I would appreciate if you could do this, (let me know if *I*
>>> can
>>> do something to support you),
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>
>>>> HTH, Chris
>>>>
>>>> Eric Lavarde - FreeMind schrieb:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understood your question.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the question is whether xsd2jibx is only needed at package build
>>>>> time
>>>>> and NOT at run time, the answer is YES.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian Foltin (GMX) said:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Eric,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that's only for the src package, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards, Chris
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eric Lavarde schrieb:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Chris,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> while still trying to package FreeMind 0.9.0 for Debian, and hence
>>>>>>> needed xsd2jibx packages, I got the attached refusal. I already
>>>>>>> contacted the upstream author for JiBX but didn't get so far any
>>>>>>> answer (2nd attached message).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would it be an alternative for you to move from JiBx 1.0 to JiBX
>>>>>>> 1.2?
>>>>>>> I understand that JiBX 1.2 doesn't require xsd2jibx anymore (well,
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> doesn't deliver it for sure).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks, Eric
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Betreff:
>>>>>>> libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED
>>>>>>> Von:
>>>>>>> Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> Datum:
>>>>>>> Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:25:07 +0000
>>>>>>> An:
>>>>>>> Eric Lavarde <[email protected]>, Debian Java Maintainers
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An:
>>>>>>> Eric Lavarde <[email protected]>, Debian Java Maintainers
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>>>>>> CC:
>>>>>>> Debian Installer <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Maintainer,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rejected, i dont believe your debian/copyright file statement about
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> license. Only one file in the tarball has a header stating the
>>>>>>> same,
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> others dont have any. There is no extra file describing the
>>>>>>> license.
>>>>>>> AND
>>>>>>> docs/index.html contains "Licensed to the JiBX Project for free
>>>>>>> distribution and use." which makes it non-distributable for
>>>>>>> everyone
>>>>>>> else. With this unresolved it can't even go into non-free.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please have upstream fix his tarball if you want it in Debian,
>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Betreff:
>>>>>>> [Fwd: libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED]
>>>>>>> Von:
>>>>>>> "Eric Lavarde - Debian" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> Datum:
>>>>>>> Fri, 8 May 2009 12:56:24 +0200 (CEST)
>>>>>>> An:
>>>>>>> "Dennis Sosnoski" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An:
>>>>>>> "Dennis Sosnoski" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Dennis,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had contacted you like 3 years ago because I planned (and did)
>>>>>>> package
>>>>>>> xsd2jibx for Debian. Now (after many delays due to a very long
>>>>>>> FreeMind
>>>>>>> release cycle) has come the time to get the package officially into
>>>>>>> Debian, but I'm facing a quite hefty rejection from the Debian FTP
>>>>>>> masters
>>>>>>> (see below).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Further informations:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - I have already packaged Jibx 1.0.2 [1], as it's the version
>>>>>>> needed
>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>> FreeMind [2] and 1.1.x is not completely backward compatible (I
>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>> even look at 1.2), and I am not sure I could fix properly issues
>>>>>>> arising
>>>>>>> through these incompatibilities, as I'm not a full blown Java
>>>>>>> programmer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - My next step would have been to check Xsd2Jibx version
>>>>>>> 0.0.0beta2b
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> see if it solves the below copyright/license issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - but, with version 1.2, you've removed xsd2jibx from the download
>>>>>>> section.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, now, I'm a bit stuck, and I would appreciate your help and
>>>>>>> support:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. could you make xsd2jibx downloadable again?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. would the latest version solve my below licensing issues? If
>>>>>>> not,
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> a new release be a possibility? (I would offer to prepare it with
>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>> the necessary licensing changes, for you to just validate and
>>>>>>> release).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. or perhaps you have another suggestion?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot, Eric
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=jibx
>>>>>>> [2] htttp://freemind.sf.net/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------- Original Message
>>>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>>>> Subject: libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED
>>>>>>> From:    "Joerg Jaspert" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> Date:    Sat, April 25, 2009 18:25
>>>>>>> To:      "Eric Lavarde" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>          "Debian Java Maintainers"
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> [email protected]
>>>>>>> Cc:      "Debian Installer" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Maintainer,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rejected, i dont believe your debian/copyright file statement about
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> license. Only one file in the tarball has a header stating the
>>>>>>> same,
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> others dont have any. There is no extra file describing the
>>>>>>> license.
>>>>>>> AND
>>>>>>> docs/index.html contains "Licensed to the JiBX Project for free
>>>>>>> distribution and use." which makes it non-distributable for
>>>>>>> everyone
>>>>>>> else.
>>>>>>> With this unresolved it can't even go into non-free.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please have upstream fix his tarball if you want it in Debian,
>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
>>> is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity
>>> professionals. Meet
>>> the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, &
>>> iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like
>>> Barbarian
>>> Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freemind-developer mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>>>
>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freemind-developer mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Freemind-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>


-- 
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freemind-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer

Reply via email to