Dear Eric, I forgot that the sources are included in the jar and that I dedicate this development to a big german flight company whose 6:45 flight at the morning was cancelled...
Chris Christian Foltin (GMX) schrieb: > Dear Eric, > > the problem with xsd2jibx is solved as I have written my own > conversion library compileXsd which is under GPLv2+ as FreeMind itself. > > HTH, Chris > > Eric Lavarde - FreeMind schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> Christian Foltin (GMX) said: >> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> using jibx1.2 is difficult. I tried with emphasis, but the complete >>> generation is different. It uses Integer vs. int all the time, >>> and the array name conventions are totally different. This means a lot >>> of code change, which is not what I want at this time. >>> >> I very much understand and support this position. >> >> >>> But do you even need xsd2jibx at package build time? Can't we take the >>> output of xsd2jibx (ie java classes and binding.xml) and >>> omit xsd2jibx completely? >>> >> You mean, declare those java classes and binding as sources and upload >> them to CVS respectively pack them in the released sources? I think this >> would be acceptable, a bit borderline in regard to the definition of >> "source", but it would solve my issue and allow me to bring FreeMind into >> Debian. >> >> So, yes, I would appreciate if you could do this, (let me know if *I* can >> do something to support you), >> Eric >> >> >>> HTH, Chris >>> >>> Eric Lavarde - FreeMind schrieb: >>> >>>> Hi Chris, >>>> >>>> I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understood your question. >>>> >>>> If the question is whether xsd2jibx is only needed at package build time >>>> and NOT at run time, the answer is YES. >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> Christian Foltin (GMX) said: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Eric, >>>>> >>>>> that's only for the src package, right? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, Chris >>>>> >>>>> Eric Lavarde schrieb: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hello Chris, >>>>>> >>>>>> while still trying to package FreeMind 0.9.0 for Debian, and hence >>>>>> needed xsd2jibx packages, I got the attached refusal. I already >>>>>> contacted the upstream author for JiBX but didn't get so far any >>>>>> answer (2nd attached message). >>>>>> >>>>>> Would it be an alternative for you to move from JiBx 1.0 to JiBX 1.2? >>>>>> I understand that JiBX 1.2 doesn't require xsd2jibx anymore (well, it >>>>>> doesn't deliver it for sure). >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, Eric >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Betreff: >>>>>> libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED >>>>>> Von: >>>>>> Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]> >>>>>> Datum: >>>>>> Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:25:07 +0000 >>>>>> An: >>>>>> Eric Lavarde <[email protected]>, Debian Java Maintainers >>>>>> <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> An: >>>>>> Eric Lavarde <[email protected]>, Debian Java Maintainers >>>>>> <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>> CC: >>>>>> Debian Installer <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Maintainer, >>>>>> >>>>>> rejected, i dont believe your debian/copyright file statement about >>>>>> the >>>>>> license. Only one file in the tarball has a header stating the same, >>>>>> the >>>>>> others dont have any. There is no extra file describing the license. >>>>>> AND >>>>>> docs/index.html contains "Licensed to the JiBX Project for free >>>>>> distribution and use." which makes it non-distributable for everyone >>>>>> else. With this unresolved it can't even go into non-free. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please have upstream fix his tarball if you want it in Debian, thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Betreff: >>>>>> [Fwd: libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED] >>>>>> Von: >>>>>> "Eric Lavarde - Debian" <[email protected]> >>>>>> Datum: >>>>>> Fri, 8 May 2009 12:56:24 +0200 (CEST) >>>>>> An: >>>>>> "Dennis Sosnoski" <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> An: >>>>>> "Dennis Sosnoski" <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello Dennis, >>>>>> >>>>>> I had contacted you like 3 years ago because I planned (and did) >>>>>> package >>>>>> xsd2jibx for Debian. Now (after many delays due to a very long >>>>>> FreeMind >>>>>> release cycle) has come the time to get the package officially into >>>>>> Debian, but I'm facing a quite hefty rejection from the Debian FTP >>>>>> masters >>>>>> (see below). >>>>>> >>>>>> Further informations: >>>>>> >>>>>> - I have already packaged Jibx 1.0.2 [1], as it's the version needed >>>>>> by >>>>>> FreeMind [2] and 1.1.x is not completely backward compatible (I didn't >>>>>> even look at 1.2), and I am not sure I could fix properly issues >>>>>> arising >>>>>> through these incompatibilities, as I'm not a full blown Java >>>>>> programmer. >>>>>> >>>>>> - My next step would have been to check Xsd2Jibx version 0.0.0beta2b >>>>>> and >>>>>> see if it solves the below copyright/license issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> - but, with version 1.2, you've removed xsd2jibx from the download >>>>>> section. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, now, I'm a bit stuck, and I would appreciate your help and >>>>>> support: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. could you make xsd2jibx downloadable again? >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. would the latest version solve my below licensing issues? If not, >>>>>> would >>>>>> a new release be a possibility? (I would offer to prepare it with >>>>>> doing >>>>>> the necessary licensing changes, for you to just validate and >>>>>> release). >>>>>> >>>>>> 3. or perhaps you have another suggestion? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a lot, Eric >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=jibx >>>>>> [2] htttp://freemind.sf.net/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------- Original Message >>>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>>> Subject: libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED >>>>>> From: "Joerg Jaspert" <[email protected]> >>>>>> Date: Sat, April 25, 2009 18:25 >>>>>> To: "Eric Lavarde" <[email protected]> >>>>>> "Debian Java Maintainers" >>>>>> <[email protected]> [email protected] >>>>>> Cc: "Debian Installer" <[email protected]> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Maintainer, >>>>>> >>>>>> rejected, i dont believe your debian/copyright file statement about >>>>>> the >>>>>> license. Only one file in the tarball has a header stating the same, >>>>>> the >>>>>> others dont have any. There is no extra file describing the license. >>>>>> AND >>>>>> docs/index.html contains "Licensed to the JiBX Project for free >>>>>> distribution and use." which makes it non-distributable for everyone >>>>>> else. >>>>>> With this unresolved it can't even go into non-free. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please have upstream fix his tarball if you want it in Debian, thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT >> is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet >> the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & >> iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian >> Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com >> _______________________________________________ >> Freemind-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Freemind-developer mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
