Brandon wrote: > > Well, it was bound to happen some time. There's now software that > > claims to be able to attack Freenet: > > > > http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,40816,00.html > > Wow! So we've finally gotten to the point that you need to disguise that > you're running a Freenet node. Or, rather, it needs to be hard to get a > list of nodes. So it's time to push through the discovery probes and > private networks then. At least someone's finally criticizing us for > actual flaws. Run the node as a proxy on :80 that knows when to send a packet to the web browser, and when to the f-node. (Uhm, may not be the issue, but maybe it helps against something else?) _______________________________________________ Freenet-chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-chat
- [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Already! Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Already! Bryan Derksen
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Already! Travis Bemann
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Already! Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Already! Jacob Stetser
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Already! g'o'tz ohnesorge
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Already! Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Already! Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Alre... Mathew Ryden
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Alre... Ian Clarke
- RE: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Already! Fred Salzer
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Alre... Ian Clarke
- RE: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- ... Fred Salzer
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freene... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-chat] Attack on Freenet -- Already! Mark J. Roberts