Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issues

[Brandon]

> Your back on legal loopholes. The fact is that the shielded node relies on
> the existance of public nodes, so you have simply moved the target that
> the enemy needs to have shut down.

You don't move the target, you reduce its size. A smaller target is better
because less nodes can get shut down. A system with *no* public nodes
would be great if someone could come up with one. But a system with fewer
public nodes (assuming that it doesn't break the network) is better.



_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev