Ian: > I am sure there is a proof somewhere that a functional freenet with no > public nodes is an impossibility. Don't ask me to find it though. Not a "Freenet", perhaps. But you could certainly have a network with Freenet routing which had no public nodes. It's just that no one has a scheme for this that isn't slow in a practical sense. I wouldn't call that provably impossible as much as impractical to implement. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Operat... Travis Bemann
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issues Matthew Toseland
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issues Benjamin Coates
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issu... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymit... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Ano... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... Travis Bemann
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Ano... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymit... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymit... Sven Neuhaus
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issu... Brandon