Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issues

[Ian Clarke]

> You don't move the target, you reduce its size. A smaller target is better
> because less nodes can get shut down. A system with *no* public nodes
> would be great if someone could come up with one. But a system with fewer
> public nodes (assuming that it doesn't break the network) is better.

I am sure there is a proof somewhere that a functional freenet with no
public nodes is an impossibility.  Don't ask me to find it though.

Ian.

PGP signature