I wouldn't worry too much about it Travis. Updating isn't going into 0.4.
I want the network optimization and P/K in 0.4. Any more is probably over
ambitious. We do need to start simulations about that time though so it
can go into 0.5
Besides, we're not really wasting time. We have all new people working on
pseudo-updating. And hats off to them.
Scott
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Travis Bemann wrote:
> There has been lots of discussion on using stuff like mapfiles/MSKs to
> handle pseudoupdating. However, pseudoupdating is just a temporary
> measure that will be obsoleted by real updating. So why don't we not
> waste our time working on a temporary measure and instead actually try
> testing pass-through and selective-broadcast updates with Serapis and
> then actually implement the better of the two updating schemes?! If
> we did this right now we might be able to get real updating in Freenet
> 0.4, but if we work on the temporary measure of mapfiles, real
> updating will probably not be in Freenet 0.4 and will wait to Freenet
> 0.5.
>
> --
> Travis Bemann
> Sendmail is still screwed up on my box.
> My email address is really [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
