Thats the part we *do* know.  You actually only need to sign the data you
want updated with the private key of the SVK (see the key bestiary to
really understand whats going on).  How to get the notification to all the
places the data lives is the problem.


On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Howdy all!
> 
> I have an idea (don't know if it will work or not though)
> 
> If I understand KSK/CHK/SSK/SVK/ETC, KSK is just basically a redirect to
> the actuall CHK (which is a hash of the data), SSK is a verified/subspace
> key where other KSK/CHK's are known and include a public/private key
> encryption.
> 
> Here's the idea.
> 
> for SSK/SVK updating, Give the KSK/CHK along with a secret key parameter
> (corresponding to however your SSK/SVK was setup)
> The If the KSK or CHK or SSK/SVK ETC. have a matching key for decoding it,
> then change the residing key (if any) to the new key that you are sending.
> 
> IE, I have Freenet:SVK@lioou08347/Alpha/test.exe
> currently I would have to have Freenet:SVK@lioou08347/Alpha/%Date% (or
> MMDDYYYY)/test.exe for the latest one.
> with my Idea you would pass to Freenet, "FInsert
> Freenet:SVK@lioou08347/Alpha/test.exe -sk=lionsandtigers" (where
> lionsandtigers is the secret key and lioou08347 is the public key/hash or
> whatever.
> 
> Just my $.02
> 
> Thnx,
> Fuller
> 
> ps. I may be way off in my understanding of SSK/SVK and how they work but
> this is just an idea. please correct me if I'm wrong
> 
> 
> At 09:33 PM 12/28/2000 -0500, you wrote:
> >There has been lots of discussion on using stuff like mapfiles/MSKs to
> >handle pseudoupdating.  However, pseudoupdating is just a temporary
> >measure that will be obsoleted by real updating.  So why don't we not
> >waste our time working on a temporary measure and instead actually try
> >testing pass-through and selective-broadcast updates with Serapis and
> >then actually implement the better of the two updating schemes?!  If
> >we did this right now we might be able to get real updating in Freenet
> >0.4, but if we work on the temporary measure of mapfiles, real
> >updating will probably not be in Freenet 0.4 and will wait to Freenet
> >0.5.
> >
> >-- 
> >Travis Bemann
> >Sendmail is still screwed up on my box.
> >My email address is really [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Attachment Converted: "h:\eudora\attach\[Freenet-dev] Why don't we get "
> >
> 
> Support the freedom of speech world wide!
> http://freenet.sourceforge.net
> 
> In a world without barriers and fences ..Why do we need Gates and Windows??
> "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad 
> "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler 
> 
> Trust won't come easily, said Jim Christy, special assistant for law
> enforcement with the U.S. Air Force.
> "Remember," he said. "In God we trust -- all others we polygraph."
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to