"Mr.Bad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also, I think Oskar and Scott need to have a powwow about > features. Scott seems to be totally opposed to 3 lines of > unnecessary code, while Oskar doesn't mind throwing in the kitchen > sink, as long as it's not used. B-) Speaking of which, could we get a comprehensive list of planned 0.4 features? It would be useful to client and alternate node authors if we could start implementing those features before they're released in Fred. -S _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... tavin
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Matthew Toseland
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Steven Hazel
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issues Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issu... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... tavin
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... Adam Langley
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Ian Clarke