Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony

[Jo Dillon]

Ole J. Tetlie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> 
> I don't really qualify as a developer, as I only take care of two
> classes. That said, I'm not eager to stop developing harmony. I can
> see three possible paths:
> 
> 1. Everyone quits developing harmony.

  Well, that's what it's looking like at the moment.
 
> 2. We continue as now, trying to make a solid LGPL Qt-replacement.
>
  Bad move, for reasons outlined previously.
 
> 3. We decide that we do not want to chase Qt, and develop our own
>    toolkit. Another toolkit is not what the world needs, but it
>    would be a lot of fun. :-)

  Without the backing of KDE I don't see that 3) would be much use,
except possibly for fun :) I wouldn't be taking part though;
I'll either be hacking stuff into Qt or working on X or something :)

-- 
        Jo

Harmony - the project to create an LGPL Qt clone
http://harmony.ruhr.de