On Sun, 22 Nov 1998, Stephan Kulow wrote: > Try to develop a derived work out of egcs or rpm that is commercial > and see FSF or RedHat suing you. And as RMS stated several times, > every work with a library is a derived work. So where's your point? librpm is licensed under LGPL. If you are a commercial entity and you wish to develop an application which uses RPM as a part of it, you may do so without paying us or fearing getting sued. --- -Preston Brown Red Hat Software, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Preston Brown
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Jo Dillon
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Ole J. Tetlie
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Jo Dillon
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Carl Thompson
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Olivier Galibert
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Jo Dillon
- [freeqt] What else you guys could do florin
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Stephan Kulow
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Preston Brown
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Bernd Gehrmann
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Carl Thompson
- Re: [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Stephan Kulow
- [freeqt] Call to finish Harmony Carl Thompson
