Stephan Kulow wrote:
>
> Carl Thompson wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am writing this message in order to persuade developers to finish
> > Harmony now instead of shelving it because of the QT license change. I
> > think it would be best for Linux to have a completely free desktop. I
> > don't think it's right for people to have to pay TT to develop
> > commercially for Linux. I don't have to pay Cygnus to use egcs. I
> > don't have to pay RedHat to use RPM. Why should I have to pay TT to
> > write a commercial GUI program?
> >
> Try to develop a derived work out of egcs or rpm that is commercial and
> see FSF or RedHat suing you.
Who said anything about derived works?
> And as RMS stated several times, every work with a library is a derived
> work. So where's your point?
I am not sure what you think RMS says, but that is certainly not what the
GPL or LGPL states.
Carl Thompson
