Carl Thompson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am writing this message in order to persuade developers to finish
> Harmony now instead of shelving it because of the QT license change. I
> think it would be best for Linux to have a completely free desktop. I don't
> think it's right for people to have to pay TT to develop commercially for
> Linux. I don't have to pay Cygnus to use egcs. I don't have to pay RedHat
> to use RPM. Why should I have to pay TT to write a commercial GUI program?
>
Try to develop a derived work out of egcs or rpm that is commercial and
see
FSF or RedHat suing you. And as RMS stated several times, every work
with
a library is a derived work. So where's your point?
Greetings, Stephan
--
Du musst weiterkaempfen bis zum Umfallen! Und wenn die ganze
Welt 'nen Arsch offen hat oder gerade deswegen. - K. Wecker
