I Agree... I run .. Bsd, linux , and OSX.. The FR Install on linux is Easy..
OS X is a Bear...
If someone has the Knowledge to make a FR Installer for OSX that takes care
of the library problems it would be great... Also..This thread would be
ended.....I would be really greatfull too. Hehe

Can't Everyone just geat along..



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Fraser
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Running on Mac OS X 10.3


OK So what I get from this thread is :

1) Not all OS' use the same dynamic linking.
2) OS X is not Linux.
3) Most FR development is done on Linux
4) Mike says he knows how to build OS X apps with Dynamic Linking

I don't use OS X, but I do need to use FreeBSD and once in a while there 
seem
to be glitches with the libtool code. The problems get fixed and I am 
greatfull.

I have NO experience writing dynamicaly loaded modules, but I am glad
someone does so that I don't have to. :-)

It would be nice if there was less sniping about development issues in 
the users
forum. I don't want the sniping to move to the developers forum, because 
I help
where I can with the development. Could you guys calm down and either ignore
each other or help each other. OS X dynamic linking does not get better by
sniping, it can only get better by somebody fixing the problem(s).

Best of luck to all concearned, and have a happy new year.

Mike Horwath wrote:

>On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Chris Parker wrote:
>  
>
>>At 05:11 PM 12/30/2003, Mike Horwath wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:05:51AM -0600, Chris Parker wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>
>...
>  
>
>>>And please, do not go looking at the problem with the dynamic linking 
>>>issues either, that would be difficult I bet.
>>>      
>>>
>>See the answer posted by another user RE the type of shared libs used 
>>by Apple in OSX.  That has the detail you are looking for.
>>    
>>
>
>You mean the info that was posted by someone else who *was trying to be 
>helpful* unlike you?
>
>Don't mind my sarcasm...
>
>  
>
>>>And libtool?  Ack.  But whatever.
>>>      
>>>
>>Got a better solution?  Please share.
>>    
>>
>
>Sure, drop the Linuxisms...  Building shared libraries isn't hard to 
>do, why do people need a 'tool' to do it?
>
>  
>


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to