Alan DeKok wrote:
> matthew zeier wrote:
>> What sort of additional information would be useful?
> i.e. WHERE the double free is. The message you showed says "something
> went wrong.". That's nice. Which line of code needs to be changed?
How would I know where the double free is? Just running 'radiusd -X' spit out
that error just before failing to run.
> Changing a line at random won't help. Hence the need to know where
> the problem is.
>> If it matters, I was
>> having the same problem with 1.1.5.
> Yes. That's fixed, and will be released in 1.1.6.
How can I get that version?
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html