btw, we are still making changes to version 6 so don't assume that the results from the beta will be consistent with the current beta distribution.
On 12/15/2015 12:22 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi Matthiew > > we are still hoping to get an official v6 release out in the next > month or two, so it would be best to use that which I think will > outperform whatever beta you have and 5.3. If you can't wait you are > probably better off using 5.3 (although I think the v6 you have is > more accurate) so that people can at least replicate the software > version you are using > > cheers > Bruce > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote: > >> Hi Bruce, >> >> Is it better to overestimate than underestimate ? Please find joined >> this two saggital images (FS v5.3 and FS v6_beta) of brain >> segmentation. Cerebellum in v6_beta really seems to go outside of its >> borderlines even if cerebellum in v5.3 is indeed lightly >> underestimated. >> >> Looking at the cerebral cortex I found the segmentation less >> "smoothed" in v6_beta (with more irregularities near pial surface) >> than in v5.3 according to coronal views of segmentations joined. >> >> What do you think about it ? Would you advise me to go on with the >> v6_beta anyway ? >> >> Would it be better and coherent to use a more recent "nightly dev >> builds" of FreeSurfer for future publication ? >> >> Thanks in advance for helping ! >> >> Best regards, >> >> Matthieu >> >> 2015-12-15 17:38 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>: >> Hi Matthieu >> >> I think 6.0 looks better overall, even in the beta that you >> have. The 5.3 >> segmentation looks like it is underestimating cerebellum and >> hippocampus to >> me. >> >> cheers >> Bruce >> >> >> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote: >> >> > Dear FS's experts, >> > >> > I have tried the recon-all process on one subject with both >> FS v5.3 and v6_beta. >> > >> > Although subcortical structures seems to be better segmented >> in v6_beta, I find that v6_beta over-segmented some >> other >> > structures as cerebellum, hippocampus, ... >> > >> > I will attached in the FileDrop my T1.mgz, and >> aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz files for both freesurfer versions. >> > >> > Could you please look at it and tell me what do you think >> about and advise me ? >> > >> > Thank you ! >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Matthieu >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> >> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to >> whom it is >> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and >> the e-mail >> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance >> HelpLine at >> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to >> you in error >> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender >> and properly >> dispose of the e-mail. >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/ _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
