me too
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Harms, Michael wrote:
It seems problematic to me to use a nightly dev build for publication.
cheers,
-MH
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: mha...@wustl.edu
From: Matthieu Vanhoutte <matthieuvanhou...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 11:13 AM
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation comparison between FS5.3 and FS6beta
Hi Bruce,
Is it better to overestimate than underestimate ? Please find joined this two
saggital images (FS v5.3 and FS v6_beta) of brain
segmentation. Cerebellum in v6_beta really seems to go outside of its
borderlines even if cerebellum in v5.3 is indeed lightly
underestimated.
Looking at the cerebral cortex I found the segmentation less "smoothed" in
v6_beta (with more irregularities near pial surface)
than in v5.3 according to coronal views of segmentations joined.
What do you think about it ? Would you advise me to go on with the v6_beta
anyway ?
Would it be better and coherent to use a more recent "nightly dev builds" of
FreeSurfer for future publication ?
Thanks in advance for helping !
Best regards,
Matthieu
2015-12-15 17:38 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
Hi Matthieu
I think 6.0 looks better overall, even in the beta that you have. The 5.3
segmentation looks like it is underestimating cerebellum and hippocampus
to
me.
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote:
> Dear FS's experts,
>
> I have tried the recon-all process on one subject with both FS v5.3 and
v6_beta.
>
> Although subcortical structures seems to be better segmented in
v6_beta, I find that v6_beta over-segmented some
other
> structures as cerebellum, hippocampus, ...
>
> I will attached in the FileDrop my T1.mgz, and aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz
files for both freesurfer versions.
>
> Could you please look at it and tell me what do you think about and
advise me ?
>
> Thank you !
>
> Best regards,
> Matthieu
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare
Information or other information of a sensitive
nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized
use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, please
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
