I mean that they may/will change between the current beta release and the final release.
On 12/15/2015 02:51 PM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote: > > Sorry Douglas I didn't well understand what you mean. Did you mean > that results from beta distribution aren't valuable ? > > Best regards, > > Matthieu > > Le 15 déc. 2015 19:24, "Douglas N Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> a écrit : > > btw, we are still making changes to version 6 so don't assume that the > results from the beta will be consistent with the current beta > distribution. > > On 12/15/2015 12:22 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > > Hi Matthiew > > > > we are still hoping to get an official v6 release out in the next > > month or two, so it would be best to use that which I think will > > outperform whatever beta you have and 5.3. If you can't wait you are > > probably better off using 5.3 (although I think the v6 you have is > > more accurate) so that people can at least replicate the software > > version you are using > > > > cheers > > Bruce > > > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote: > > > >> Hi Bruce, > >> > >> Is it better to overestimate than underestimate ? Please find > joined > >> this two saggital images (FS v5.3 and FS v6_beta) of brain > >> segmentation. Cerebellum in v6_beta really seems to go outside > of its > >> borderlines even if cerebellum in v5.3 is indeed lightly > >> underestimated. > >> > >> Looking at the cerebral cortex I found the segmentation less > >> "smoothed" in v6_beta (with more irregularities near pial surface) > >> than in v5.3 according to coronal views of segmentations joined. > >> > >> What do you think about it ? Would you advise me to go on with the > >> v6_beta anyway ? > >> > >> Would it be better and coherent to use a more recent "nightly dev > >> builds" of FreeSurfer for future publication ? > >> > >> Thanks in advance for helping ! > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> Matthieu > >> > >> 2015-12-15 17:38 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl > <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>: > >> Hi Matthieu > >> > >> I think 6.0 looks better overall, even in the beta that you > >> have. The 5.3 > >> segmentation looks like it is underestimating cerebellum and > >> hippocampus to > >> me. > >> > >> cheers > >> Bruce > >> > >> > >> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote: > >> > >> > Dear FS's experts, > >> > > >> > I have tried the recon-all process on one subject with both > >> FS v5.3 and v6_beta. > >> > > >> > Although subcortical structures seems to be better > segmented > >> in v6_beta, I find that v6_beta over-segmented some > >> other > >> > structures as cerebellum, hippocampus, ... > >> > > >> > I will attached in the FileDrop my T1.mgz, and > >> aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz files for both freesurfer versions. > >> > > >> > Could you please look at it and tell me what do you think > >> about and advise me ? > >> > > >> > Thank you ! > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > Matthieu > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Freesurfer mailing list > >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > >> > >> > >> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to > >> whom it is > >> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and > >> the e-mail > >> contains patient information, please contact the Partners > Compliance > >> HelpLine at > >> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to > >> you in error > >> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender > >> and properly > >> dispose of the e-mail. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Freesurfer mailing list > > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > -- > Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. > MGH-NMR Center > gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358> > Fax: 617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422> > > Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting > <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting> > FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 > www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html > <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html> > Outgoing: > ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/ > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/ _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
