Hi Eugenio,

Did you already do this?  If so, a published reference would be more useful
to me than instructions for how to do it, as I¹m more interested in making
an argument for an acquisition protocol modification.

Matt.

From:  <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of "Iglesias,
Eugenio" <e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>
Reply-To:  Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date:  Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 1:37 PM
To:  Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject:  Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation - what is the
voxel size of the input?

Hi Matt, 
you can use strategy 3 of my previous email ;-)
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


> On 9 Jun 2016, at 19:31, Matt Glasser <m...@ma-tea.com> wrote:
> 
> I would be interested to know how well 0.7mm isotropic resolution data
> performs at hippocampal segmentation.  It would be better if folks could do
> this then needing to acquire specialized anisotropic scans for hippocampal
> segmentation.
> 
> Peace,
> 
> Matt.
> 
> From: <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Fernando Pasquini
> Santos <fernandop...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Date: Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 1:23 PM
> To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation - what is the voxel
> size of the input?
> 
> Dear,
> 
> I have a doubt regarding the input T1 image used for the Hippocampal Subfield
> segmentation in Freesurfer 6.0 -
> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields
> 
> In this documentation it says that I can use a standard 1mm T1 image or the
> same standard 1mm T1 image with an additional scan. However, I want to use a
> 0.7mm T1 image as input, with an additional T2 scan. When I run the program
> with it, the output images (nu.mgz and orig.mgz) are downsampled to 1mm voxel
> size. So, I don't know if this happens just because of the recon-all program
> or if the segmentation is being done in the downsampled T1 image or in the
> original 0.7mm.
> 
> By reading the article "A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation
> using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Application to adaptive segmentation
> of in vivo MRI" I saw that, in the methods section, the algorithm is used to
> segment 0.6mm T1 images. But is this possible to do in the Freesurfer package?
> Obviously, doing the segmentation directly on 0.7mm data would be better than
> a downsampled version to 1mm...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Fernando Pasquini Santos
> PhD student in Dynamic Systems
> fernandosan...@pitt.edu
> fernando.pasquini.san...@usp.br
> _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information
> in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you
> believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient
> information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly dispose of the e-mail.
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.

_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information
in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If
you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains
patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
and properly dispose of the e-mail.

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to