Not sure. It might be more accurate. Once you have the FWHM you want, you can run mri_glmfit-sim with --fwhm-override
On 07/17/2017 05:43 PM, Jordi Pegueroles wrote: > Dear FS experts, > > I was wondering if someone had performed multiple comparisons (ie > monte-carlo) with the LME analyses. I have found a thread > (https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg40195.html) > where Doug recommends to run a GLM fit with the same data and then > overwrite the sig.mgh file with the LME one. > > My question is if is not more accurate to estimate the residuals from > the LME model, then compute the relative smooth of the data with the > mris_fwhm command and pass it as an argument in the mri_surfcluster > command (mri_surfcluster --in $direct1/sig.mgh --csd > /Applications/freesurfer/average/mult-comp-cor/fsaverage/${hemi}/cortex/fwhm${rfwhm}/abs/th13/mc-z.csd > > --cwsig $direct1/mc.abs.th13.sig.cluster.mgh --vwsig > $direct1/abs.th13.sig.vertex.mgh --cwpvalthresh 0.05 --surf white). > > Thanks in advance. > -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/ _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
