LOL, and thanks for these responses.  Yes, my current arrangement is quite 
loose, and being rather naive, I haven't thought it to be a problem until it 
occurred to me my co-hort could be off and marketing the sim without me knowing 
about it, possibly even to the Walt Disney corp. 

Lesson taken, I'd better get a clear agreement happening and/or for him to 
grant me a licence to the computer code.  Does anyone happen to have a good 
form document precedent for such a licence?  

Hugh
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Miles Parker 
  To: [email protected] ; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee 
Group 
  Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 8:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Publishing Agreements (was "More mumbo-jumbo")




  LOL. Yeah, I made it sound a lot more cut and dry then it probably actually 
is. Even in software there copyright can apply to L&F. There was a famous case 
in the 80s between Borland and umm.. Lotus (?) about the design of the 
spreadsheet interface. And then of course you get the fucking Walt Disney 
corporation involved and all bets are off. So just don't come up with some 
Mickey Mouse piece of code, ok Hugh?


  On Oct 3, 2009, at 7:52 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:


    WTFDIK, but, werent there some cases recently where somebody followed the 
outline and sequence of topics in another person's book and got skinned for it? 
 Breach of ethics, only?  Or did they actually have to settle?

    Nick

    Nicholas S. Thompson
    Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, 
    Clark University ([email protected])
    http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/




      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Miles Parker 
      To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
      Sent: 10/3/2009 8:07:39 PM 
      Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Publishing Agreements (was "More mumbo-jumbo")




      IANAL of course, but in general this situation is no different form one 
where ay someone has an idea, tells it to someone else, and that someone else 
writes a book about it. Ideas can't be copyrighted but software can; and 
implementations of ideas can be patented. (Yuck, though..) Am I right folks? By 
default the copyright is with the actual author, i.e. in this case the 
programer, unless there is some specific agreement otherwise. But that's just 
the default situation; if that's not what you want then you guys need to come 
up with an agreement that specifies that you share copyright and then make sure 
that the code has the appropriate notices. That should be really 
straightforward.




      On Oct 3, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Hugh Trenchard wrote:


        Hi Robert. I subscribe to the FRIAM listserv, and have seen your note 
here. 

        I'm wondering what the law is regarding the sharing of intellectual 
property where one person establishes the general rules for a computer 
simulation and then takes those rules to a programmer who then creates a 
specific program based on your rules.  Do you both share in the resulting 
simulation, or can the programmer argue the simulation is his/hers?  I am in a 
situation where I have established the general rules for a simulation, and 
another fellow has created the actual sim - so am curious to know how we should 
go about claiming our respective intellectual property rights (hopefully they 
are shared).

        Thanks and would be grateful if you could run this by Dr Winchell.

        Hugh Trenchard
        Victoria
          ----- Original Message -----
          From: Robert Cordingley
          To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
          Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 10:35 AM
          Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Publishing Agreements (was "More mumbo-jumbo")


          For those nearby, don't forget the sfComplex Meeting on Intellectual 
Property is next Tuesday, October 6, 2009 2:00 pm to 4:00 pm 
(seehttp://sfcomplex.org/wordpress/2009/09/intel_property#more-3032 for 
details).  I can try to get Bruce to answer a few questions like these if it's 
too far for you.  Email me your question (50 words or less) and I'll see what I 
can do.

          Thanks,
          Robert C


          ERIC P. CHARLES wrote: 
            Interestingly,
            Most journals I interact with no longer have paper options for this 
sort of thing. All you do is click on a link that says "I agree". I have 
wondered how enforceable any such agreement is, and what the publisher would do 
if I insisted on a paper transaction in which I could do things like write in 
clauses. Has anyone had experience with these issues?

            Eric

            <snipped>



----------------------------------------------------------------------



          ============================================================
          FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
          Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
          lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

        ============================================================
        FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
        Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
        lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
    lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  ============================================================
  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
  lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to