Ariz. gov signs bill revising new immigration law

April 28, 2010

Gov. Jan Brewer on Friday signed a follow-on bill approved by Arizona
legislators that make revisions to the state's sweeping law against illegal
immigration - changes she says should quell concerns that the measure will
lead to racial profiling.

 

The changes include one strengthening restrictions against using race or
ethnicity as the basis for questioning by police and inserts those same
restrictions in other parts of the law.

Another change states that immigration-status questions would follow a law
enforcement officer's stopping, detaining or arresting a person while
enforcing another law. The earlier law had referred to a "contact" with
police.

Another change specifies that possible violations of local civil ordinances
can trigger questioning on immigration status.

 

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-04-28/news/20877675_1_illegal-immigration-im
migration-status-national-immigration-law-center

 

 

cjf

Christopher J. Feola
President, nextPression
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/cjfeola

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Robert Holmes
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 12:13 PM
To: [email protected]; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee
Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Arizona meets the Facebook community

 

Russ, Nick,

 

Here is the relevant part of the Arizona Senate Bill 1070
<http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf> :

 

40  13-1509. Trespassing by illegal aliens; assessment; exception;

41  classification

42  A. IN ADDITION TO ANY VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW, A PERSON IS GUILTY OF

43  TRESPASSING IF THE PERSON IS BOTH:

44  1. PRESENT ON ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE LAND IN THIS STATE.

45  2. IN VIOLATION OF 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1304(e) OR 1306(a).

 

1   B. IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THIS SECTION, THE FINAL DETERMINATION OF AN

2   ALIEN'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY EITHER:

3   1. A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO IS AUTHORIZED BY THE FEDERAL

4   GOVERNMENT TO VERIFY OR ASCERTAIN AN ALIEN'S IMMIGRATION STATUS.

5   2. A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR AGENCY COMMUNICATING WITH THE UNITED

6   STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT OR THE UNITED STATES BORDER

7   PROTECTION PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).

 

The two codes referred to a line 45 are:

*       8 USC 1304 (e <http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/8/12/II/VII/1304>
), which demands that "Every alien, eighteen years of age and over, shall at
all times carry with him and have in his personal possession any certificate
of alien registration or alien registration receipt card issued to him"; and
*       8 USC 1306 (a) <http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/8/12/II/VII/1306>
, which concerns the "willful failure to register".

The important point is that 1070 puts no limitation on Law Enforcement
Officers (LEO) on how they determine an alien's immigration status. No
indication of how (or indeed if) the 4th amendment's probable cause should
be applied. Note: other states are explicit on what is allowed in an
interaction between LEOs and members of the public (see Google for details).

 

In short, the Arizona law allows Law Enforcement Officers to stop anyone and
demand proof that they are not an alien who is trespassing in Arizona. 

 

-- R

 

 

 

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Nicholas Thompson
<[email protected]> wrote:

Russ,

Well, presumably i got those facts from some left wing rant.  They both
seemed like the kind of "facts" that would be difficult to fake, so I
believed them.  I will do my best to back them up.  Please hold your mind
open for a time while I do that.


Nick

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
Clark University ([email protected])
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]




> [Original Message]

> From: Russell Gonnering <[email protected]>
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
> Date: 5/9/2010 8:40:08 AM

> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Arizona meets the Facebook community
>
> Nick-
>
> Please cite the facts that support your contention re the Arizona law
empowering the police to ask for papers if you just happen to "look"
Mexican and the source of the heavy weapons flowing to Mexico.
>
> The idea that the types of military-grade weapons used comes from
smuggling civilian weapons bought in border states is refuted by:
>
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2009/03/legal-us-arms-
<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2009/03/legal-us-arms
-%0d%0aexports-may-be-source-narco-syndicates-rising-firepower> 
exports-may-be-source-narco-syndicates-rising-firepower
>
> The 90% of weapons having a US origin figure quoted by the Obama
administration is called into question by that notoriously right-wing
organization, the Annenberg Public Policy Center:
>  http://www.factcheck.org/2009/04/counting-mexicos-guns/index.html
>
> Reading the text of the bill:
> http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070h.pdf
> I see no statute that entitles a "show me your papers" demand unless it
is in the course of investigation of a crime.  The straw man argument that
police in Arizona (many of whom are Hispanic themselves) will harass people
because they don't like the way they look BECAUSE of this bill does not
seem logical.  No doubt harassment occurs now, for a variety of reasons,
but it would seem to be isolated incidents caused by bad cops, just like
everywhere else in the US (or Mexico, for that matter).
>
> The Arizona bill provides for a fascinating  study in emergence to anyone
interested in complexity theory in the sociologic context.  The current
situation of increased crime, massive expenditure of Arizona capital and
lack of federal responsibility in dealing with the situation has placed the
situation at the "edge of chaos".  The attractor wells are now insufficient
to stabilize the situation, and something needs to change.  It strikes me
that introducing political ideology and straw-man arguments into the mix
clouds the opportunity to learn something from the situation.  David
Snowden has eloquently shown, in his Cynefin Framework, what happens when
an attempt is made to treat a complex domain as though it were simple, or
even complicated: it drives the domain into chaos.  The Arizona law can be
viewed as a probe.  The key is to now sense for the emergent order and
respond.
>
> Or we can just sit back and watch the situation  devolve into chaos.....
>
> I usually do carry my driver's license when I go to the mall, even when I
ride my bike.  I sort of like the idea of someone knowing who I am if I'm
hit by a bus.  If I happen to buy an adult beverage, I have to "show my
papers", and that isn't to a cop, or even because I am being investigated
for breaking a law.  I don't feel imposed upon.  When I lived in Austria, I
had to carry my Ausweis all the time, and show it upon occasion when I went
to a hotel, cashed a check and once, to "the man",  when I attempted to
ride the streetcar without paying and was caught.
>
> Russ #3
>
> Russell Gonnering, MD, MMM, FACS, CPHQ
> [email protected]
> www.emergenthealth.net
>
>
> On May 9, 2010, at 1:04 AM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
>
> > Hey, guys.  Isnt there  already a law in Arizona that requires
employers to check the papers of anybody they hire and gives them a website
to do it? I understand that that law is not enforced, because, obviously,
it would interfere with employers exploitation of illegal aliens.  If it
were enforced, much of Arizona's problem would be solved without the
application of racial profiling, wouldn't it?
> >
> > Owen, would you really be happy to have your papers demanded every time
you went to the Plaza because you happen to wear a pony tail?   I really
find it hard to imagine any FRIAM member being happy to have to carry and
show papers every time she or he goes to the mall.  You Defenders of Net
Freedom, you!
> >
> > Also,  a lot of illegal traffic coming from mexico would be curtailed
if we would stop the flow of heavy weaponry from the US TO Mexico.
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> >
> > Nicholas S. Thompson
> > Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
> > Clark University ([email protected])
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
> > http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Owen Densmore
> > To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> > Sent: 5/8/2010 9:24:17 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Arizona meets the Facebook community
> >
> > Nicely said.
> >
> > It does seem to me that the nation itself is waiting for the
immigration reform that should naturally be coming from the grid-locked
congress/senate.  I hope Arizona forces us to act in unity.
> >
> > Its fine to revert to "don't ask, don't tell" but it's dishonest.
> >
> > Clearly the endgame will have to be amnesty plus a work visa plus a
means towards citizenship if desired.
> >
> > Unfortunately, the republicans have found a negative game strategy that
guarantees at worst a stalemate, and at best, a win in the next election.
> >
> >     -- Owen
> >
> >
> > On May 8, 2010, at 8:45 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Russ Abbott <[email protected]>
wrote:
> >> It's not Arizona. Arizona was simply the first state to have the guts
to act. More than 50% of Americans apparently approve the Arizona law.  We
should boycott the entire country--except perhaps enclaves like Sante Fe
(?) and Los Angeles (where I live).  Do you know what the statistics are
with respect to how people in Sante Fe feel about the new law?
> >>
> >>
> >> Those statistics were before major league baseball started organizing
to move the all-star game out of Arizona.
> >>
> >> Arizona was also the only state that had the guts to dis Martin Luther
King Jr's birthday as a holiday.  Until the NFL moved the Super Bowl to
Pasadena from Phoenix.
> >>
> >> I also believe it's been demonstrated that you can get "more than 50%
of Americans to apparently approve" anything if you phrase the question
right.
> >>
> >> -- rec --
> >> ============================================================
> >> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> >> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> >> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
> >
> > ============================================================
> > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
>



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to