Interesting. It seems though it isn't knowledge that is core to your
discussion but our 'knowing' - the human experience. What makes some
things 'compiled' knowledge (in our experience, like riding a bike) and
some things expressible knowledge (which we can teach, like nuclear
physics)? Is it a physiological problem between muscle memory, the
spinal cord, and the thing we call the brain?
Robert C
www.cirrillian.com <http://www.cirrillian.com>
On 8/18/11 6:03 PM, ERIC P. CHARLES wrote:
Shameless plug: I have started a academically-oriented blog. I suspect
my most recent post, on 'The Myth of Knowledge
<http://fixingpsychology.blogspot.com/>', is relevant to many of the
discussions that I have been part of on this list, and will be of
interest to at least a few people here.
I now return you to your regularly scheduled posts (and second the
point that the 'ultimate L' article was very cool).
Eric
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
