Patrick -
Hola Todos:

With no disparagement intended to Jochen, I will point out that the sacred texts of Judeo-Christianity are riddled with commandments of intolerance as well as love. God is on the record as demanding murder and worse for trivial acts or for simply living in the wrong valley.
I am possibly the *least* religious person on this list (despite all my mad psuedospiritual ravings) and I agree with you that there are hugely *offensive* (by today's standards) statements made in the name of or on behalf of the (Old Testament/Quranic/Talmudic/???) judgemental, punishing, paternalistic god. But that is just a reflection of how cultures of those times and places worked.

I suppose your point is made, however... that does not provide a promising basis for a "kinder, gentler" way... but then that is what I suppose Christ was interested into the mix for, throw in some more peace, love and forgiveness!

So I will also support Jochen's statement that "true Christians" (WeverTF those are, or if I ever met one) are "really good people"... insomuch as they actually *follow* the new testament message and allow it to supercede the old testament.

*I* suspect that there could be some work to do some formal "deprecation" of the worst of the Old Testament? Lose the Smiting and Spiting? And yet all (?) contemporary cultures are full of "punishing" behaviour. MADD mothers and Greenpeace and PETA being examples of near militaristic forms of "kindness".

Maybe there *is* no social "programme" without a stick *and* a carrot?

Continuar Amigos y Amigas,
 - Steve





---- Pat

On Monday, January 20, 2014, Jochen Fromm <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    It is not only a metaphor. It goes deeper, and it touches the core
    of our civilization and what it means to be human. Religious
    groups are adaptive units subject to evolution. They are based on
    replicating entities shaped by group selection.

    First I want to say that true Christians are wonderful people,
    they are a blessing for everybody. Those who really read the bible
    every day and practice it, not the ones who only pretend to be it.
    Jesus must have been a wonderful person, too, someone who loved
    everyone, men or women, old or young, rich or poor. And when he
    died this horrible death at the cross his followers must have
    thought this can't be true, such a wonderful person doesn't
    deserved this. And some of his followers had the idea to write his
    story down.

    When human beings are really governed by love, you indeed get a
    society worth living in. "thou shalt not" and "eye for an eye;
    tooth for a tooth" is the Old Testament, the foundation of the
    Jewish religion. The main commandment of the New Testament is love
    (Matthew 22, 36-40): "Love the Lord your God with all your heart
    and with all your soul and with all your mind. And [..] love your
    neighbor as yourself. All the Law and the Prophets hang on these
    two commandments."

    Christians live in bubble of politeness, but rich people, too. See
    e.g. http://www.vice.com/read/filthy-lucre "If you have money, you
    can pay to live in a bubble of politesse. Excellent wine choice,
    sir. Here's your gift bag, madam. Often, you don't have to pay for
    it [..] Soon, you think this treatment is earned." Rich people pay
    much money to live in this bubble of politesse and politeness.
    Living in such a bubble can indeed make you believe you are worth
    it, and those with money usually think they deserve it. Although
    they themselves behave quite contrary: arrogance is not uncommon
    among the rich.

    Christians have discovered much earlier a way to get along with
    each other without money, and how to make this miserable place a
    bit less miserable. Religions are not ancient nonense, they
    contain ancient wisdom how to make a life worth living. They
    consist of rules and instructions which are thousands of years old
    and still work.

    You know, the holy book which is read every saturday (in the
    Jewish religion) or sunday (in the Christian one) is in fact
    nothing else but a bundle of instructions how to create a group of
    people which get along with each other. The preacher who preaches
    a sermon is like someone who translate the genes of the holy
    script. He reads the genetic information (the DNA) and creates a
    message (the RNA) so that the believers can translate the
    information into behavior. The behavior of the church members is
    the protein which is generated. Church service is the expression
    of cultural genes, and religious groups are adaptive units subject
    to evolution and group selection.

    There you have it, the mystery of religion. From a sociological
    perspective it is quite obvious. All the basic religious terms are
    related to group terms:

    god: group
    sin: breaking the rules of the group
    blessing/curse: wish to be included in/excluded from the group
    heaven/hell: being loved/hated by the group
    prophet: founder of the group
    priest: maintainer of the group
    holy (profane): something which belongs to the group (or not)
    holy book: history and blueprint of the group
    prayer: conversation of individual and group
    word of god, commandment: laws of the group
    baptism: gain a new existence as a member of a group

    This doesn't mean that we all have to eat only "kosher" things
    now, though ;-)

    See also
    * Emile Durkheim, The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, 1912
    * Randall Collins, "Sociological Insight", Oxford University
    Press, 1992
    * David Sloan Wilson, "Darwin's cathedral", University Of Chicago
    Press, 2003

    -Jochen


    On 01/20/2014 10:40 PM, glen wrote:

        On 01/20/2014 12:39 PM, Jochen Fromm wrote:

            http://blog.cas-group.net/2013/07/fascism-and-cancer/

        Great post!  But, as usual, the metaphor prevents me from
        thinking more
        than it helps me to think.

        It seems fairly obvious to me that cancers are failures at the
        cellular
        scale. (Am I wrong?)  The coarser and finer constructs are all
        useful
        mechanisms that only go bad when the cell scale goes wonky.
         In order to
        make this metaphor between totalitarianism and cancer into a
        useful
        thinking tool, we have to identify the analog of the cellular
        scale
        within the totalitarian system.  Does the cell map to the
        individual?
        ... if not, then what?

        If we push the metaphor, I would argue that the humans that
        constitute
        totalitarian regimes are _normal_ humans.  The merged
        sub-systems that
        you're mapping to tumors aren't (to my mind) like tumors at all.
        They're more like resonant frequencies than misgrown tissues.
         This
        brings us back to Arlo's concept of kindling homogenously
        strapped to
        the handle of an ax.  It's a systemic pattern that, if broken,
        could
        snap back to a healthy regime.  That's definitely not the case
        with
        cancer.  Just breaking the resonant pattern so that the cells
        can float
        around amongst the their healthy brethren won't do much good
        at all, and
        would probably make things much worse.

        But I suppose you could counter with the idea that the
        individuals who
        have been _trained_ by a resonant frequency like capitalism
        are (over
        time) broken/damaged by that coarser forcing structure.  But I
        think the
        cause vs. effect is flipped for the two systems, making the
        analogy fail
        in an important way.  In one the resonant structure causes the
        broken
        individual.  In the other, the broken individual causes the
        neoplasm.



    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
    to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com



--
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to