hey man I can down a beer get to level 10 in pokemon, and (eventually) make it to wedtech :P Plus the wedtech rants and raves are at least interesting Choosing between a dysfunctional robot or neurotic robot is a little less so
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:22 AM, cody dooderson <[email protected]> wrote: > If Glen is talking about what I think he is. It takes me roughly 14 hours, > after eating an enchilada, to get a homogeneous result from my simulation > of this year's election, but I have a particularly slow moving large > intestine. > > > > > > Cody Smith > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Steven A Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> no shit sherlock! >> >> >> what a great phrase in an auspicious time? >> >> On 10/3/16 5:29 PM, glen ☣ wrote: >> >>> I liked the point as made by this post: >>> >>> http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/09/28/debate-nights-biggest >>> -lie-was-told-by-lester-holt/ >>> >>> But even if we admit that the only purpose for the peripheral candidates >>> is to influence the actual candidates, we still have an argument for >>> allowing them to debate. So, the answer to the question of why they're not >>> in the debate really is because it's _bipartisan_ not nonpartisan. It's >>> just another example of how the expressivity of your language biases what >>> you do/can understand. >>> >>> On 10/03/2016 04:21 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote: >>> >>>> Gary Johnson is not plausible. Didn't 538 say his odds were 2 in 100? >>>> >>>> On Oct 3, 2016 5:05 PM, "Robert Wall" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> This simulation ensemble conducted by *FiveThirtyEight *gives some >>>>> plausibility to New Mexico becoming the new Florida with Gary >>>>> Johnson--not >>>>> Jill Stein--playing the part of Ralph Nader. It also gives some >>>>> non-zero >>>>> plausibility to Gary Johnson becoming the next POTUS. So why isn't >>>>> Johnson >>>>> in the debates? Isn't plausibility the real criterion? We need to >>>>> find >>>>> out more about this potential next POTUS. Yes? 🤔😁 >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> ============================================================ >> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv >> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College >> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com >> > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
