I found the article from the Dalai Lama in the NYT today fairly plausible 
explanation of why we have the current problem.    But, I would say, no, there 
will be no brotherhood with the Bundy's.   The redistributionist approach (that 
Brooks -- libertarian -- objects to elsewhere) arises in order to give the 
possibility of free enterprise, not to preserve it for those that haven't 
realized they've simply failed to be sufficiently enterprising.

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of glen ?
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 2:30 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Trump Is Just A Normal Polling Error Behind Clinton | 
FiveThirtyEight

I'll add some context.  Once upon a time (or at least so I thought), big-L 
Libertarians were actually libertarians.  This was back when truly independent 
(i.e. crazy) people were welcome and celebrated at Libertarian conventions.  It 
used to be "the party of principle".  So, in the good old days, it was not a 
joke at all.  The Libertarians could be counted on to refuse privileges that 
were obviously "dirty" (like tax money which is "forcibly" extracted from 
unwilling citizens).  But somewhere along the way, the Libertarian party (and 
the word "libertarian") was hijacked and infiltrated by standard right wingers 
who saw an opportunity to make their repugnant views more socially acceptable.  
When that happened, the Libertarians lost their principles and became a kind of 
softer set of right wingers.  And those people are perfectly willing to engage 
in "dirty" dealings (like accepting federal funding) when it suits them.

On 11/04/2016 01:21 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> Just joking that Libertarians (ie libbies) should refuse to take campaign 
> funding from the government and refuse to participate in government run 
> elections, or they're clearly acting as LINO's (Libertarians In Name Only).  
> Sorry, it was an old joke the first time.

>     __ _
>
>     Aren't the libbies constitutionally required to disdain funding 
> from the government?  Seems like they should disdain elections, too, 
> hold out for victory by acclamation?____


--
☣ glen

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to