Wouldn't a social person aim to mitigate the stupidity, along the lines the of the resistance within the White House? Or is there some reason it is best to bore on ahead with the stupidity? Because it is undemocratic or just because it is a bother?
On 9/14/18, 4:53 PM, "Friam on behalf of uǝlƃ ☣" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Ha! When I was in college, I distracted myself from my failings at electrical engineering ... and my failure to grok topology by reading the University of Chicago's Ethics: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/et/current. One issue had an essay on "Killing versus Letting Die". I remember reading it while walking to "Electronic Properties of Materials", a 1st world privilege if there ever was one. I forget the issue and the author ... and even the content. But I can say I think stealing and releasing a deadly virus is somehow different from letting people kill themselves with their own stupidity. >8^D On 09/14/2018 03:38 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > Good science fiction would develop characters like David Morse's character in 12 Monkeys as protagonists. -- ☣ uǝlƃ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
