So ... Rosen's openness to material flow, closure to operational flow, allows 
*both* endo- and exothermic sub-systems.  But his (M,R)-systems focus on 
maintaining organization using energy-material harvested from the gradient, 
ignoring sub-systems that produce energy-material?

On 10/24/18 9:20 AM, Prof David West wrote:
> I am pretty sure that the questions you pose, and the ideas of people
> like Rosen, arise from a failure to recognize the qualitative difference
> among structures and therefore miss the essence of "organization."
> This, in turn is largely attributable to the fact that we enjoy a highly
> developed "science" of Entropy and Entropic Structuralism (Physics,
> Chemistry, Astronomy, etc.) but almost no equivalent science of
> Anentropy. Recombinant DNA and CRISPR are at the level  of alchemy in
> this regard. Sociology, Anthropology, Psychology, Ecology, etc. are, at
> best, aspiring to alchemy.
> pretentiously yours,


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to