It's not pesky for me in the slightest. I'm *very* interested. I haven't 
contributed because it's not clear I have anything to contribute.

Maybe I can start with a criticism, though. It's unclear to me why you (or 
anyone) would delicately flip through crumbling pages of philosophy when there 
are fresh and juicy results from (interventionist) methods right in front of 
us? The oxytocin post really *was* inspired by this thread. But because you 
guys are talking about dead white men like Peirce and James, it's unclear how 
the science relates. 

My skepticism goes even deeper (beyond dead white men) to why one would think 
*anyone* (alive, dead, white or brown) might be able to *think* up an 
explanation for how knowledge grows. I would like to, but cannot, avoid the 
inference that this belief anyone (or any "school" of people) can think up 
explanations stems from a bias toward *individualism*. My snarky poke at "super 
intelligent god-people" in a post awhile back was (misguidedly) intended to 
express this same skepticism. I worry that poking around in old philosophy is 
simply an artifact of the mythology surrounding the "mind" and Great Men 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_man_theory>.

It seems to me like science works in *spite* of our biases to individualism. 
So, if I want to understand knowledge, I have to stop identifying ways of 
knowing through dead individuals and focus on the flowing *field* of the 
collective scientists.

Of course, that doesn't mean we ignore the writings of the dead people. But it 
means liberally slashing away anything that even smells obsolete.

Regardless of what you do post, don't interpret *my* lack of response as 
disinterest or irritation, because it's not.

On 3/5/20 6:14 AM, Prof David West wrote:
> And the key to my being a pest — is anyone else curious about these things?


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to