Frank,

it could be either. For trolling I would have to assume a particular form of 
intent and. like glen or steve pointed out, making that kind of assumption with 
this group would never occur to me.

It could have been an instance of insight like Huxley alludes to. That happens 
all the time with kids, especially perceptive ones, who have not been ruined by 
formal education and who still believe they can create new words that have the 
precise meaning they are conveying, without realizing that us educated folks 
have channelized our brains and see error rather than nuanced precision, yet 
subtle, meaning.

davew


On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, at 6:30 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
> Dave,
> 
> Was my memory of my then 7 year-old daughter confusing "oxytocin" and 
> "oxymoron" an instance of trolling or the kind of experience you were 
> alluding to in
> 
> "He could never, poor fellow, have seen a bunch of flowers shining with their 
> own inner light and all but quivering under the pre3ssure of the significance 
> with which they were charged; could never have perceived that what rose and 
> iris and carnation so intensely signified was nothing more, and nothing less, 
> than what they were — a transience that was yet eternal life, a perpetual 
> perishing that was at the same time pure Being, a bundle of minute, unique 
> particulars in which, by some unspeakable and yet self-evident paradox, was 
> to be seen the divine source of all existence."
> 
> ?
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:59 AM uǝlƃ ☣ <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It's not pesky for me in the slightest. I'm *very* interested. I haven't 
>> contributed because it's not clear I have anything to contribute.
>> 
>>  Maybe I can start with a criticism, though. It's unclear to me why you (or 
>> anyone) would delicately flip through crumbling pages of philosophy when 
>> there are fresh and juicy results from (interventionist) methods right in 
>> front of us? The oxytocin post really *was* inspired by this thread. But 
>> because you guys are talking about dead white men like Peirce and James, 
>> it's unclear how the science relates. 
>> 
>>  My skepticism goes even deeper (beyond dead white men) to why one would 
>> think *anyone* (alive, dead, white or brown) might be able to *think* up an 
>> explanation for how knowledge grows. I would like to, but cannot, avoid the 
>> inference that this belief anyone (or any "school" of people) can think up 
>> explanations stems from a bias toward *individualism*. My snarky poke at 
>> "super intelligent god-people" in a post awhile back was (misguidedly) 
>> intended to express this same skepticism. I worry that poking around in old 
>> philosophy is simply an artifact of the mythology surrounding the "mind" and 
>> Great Men <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_man_theory>.
>> 
>>  It seems to me like science works in *spite* of our biases to 
>> individualism. So, if I want to understand knowledge, I have to stop 
>> identifying ways of knowing through dead individuals and focus on the 
>> flowing *field* of the collective scientists.
>> 
>>  Of course, that doesn't mean we ignore the writings of the dead people. But 
>> it means liberally slashing away anything that even smells obsolete.
>> 
>>  Regardless of what you do post, don't interpret *my* lack of response as 
>> disinterest or irritation, because it's not.
>> 
>>  On 3/5/20 6:14 AM, Prof David West wrote:
>>  > And the key to my being a pest — is anyone else curious about these 
>> things?
>> 
>> 
>>  -- 
>>  ☣ uǝlƃ
>> 
>>  ============================================================
>>  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>>  to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>  archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>>  FRIAM-COMIC <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC> 
>> http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
> 
> 
> -- 
> Frank Wimberly
> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz
> Santa Fe, NM 87505
> 505 670-9918
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
> 
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to